Critos Argument Essay -- essays research papers

The purpose of &quotCrito&quot seems intended to exhibit the character of Socrates in one light only, not as the philosopher, fulfilling a divine representation and trusting in the will of Heaven, but simply as the unspoiled citizen, who, having been unjustly condemned is willing to give up his life in faithfulness to the laws of the State. The main argument that seems to entail the discussion between Crito and Socrates is the perspective of the volume on Socrates fate. In the &quotCrito&quot Socrates body politics, &quotWhy should we oversee so much for what the absolute majority think?&quot (Plato 45) Socrates believes that we should not parcel out what the majority thinks because those who are reasonable people will understand. However, Critos counter-argument to this is that the majority can cause great harm therefore we should care what they think. Socrates win goes on to say the majority acts haphazardly therefore, they cannot do great entire or gr eat harm (Plato 45). Crito says that "the confidence of the many" would judge us wrong if we didnt help you (and anyone in your position would agree that you ought to escape). Socrates notes that some opinion is right-hand(a) and some opinion is wrong. It is not simply a press of mere opinion, but of correct opinion. The authority in this case is the factual truth of the matter. Socrates introduces a distinction between true opinion and sham opinion. And the way to the latter is through argument and reason. By appealing to the opinion of "the many," Crito seems to be committing the Ad Populum Fallacy (i.e., something is right, true, etc., because the majority of the population says it is). Socrates seems to pose an unaffixed argument the opinion of the many says that escaping from jail is right but is it right? Socrates seems to believe that although the majority believes it is right for him to escape from jail he is release against what he believes to be tr ue. Socrates believes that he has a tacit consent with the state by living in capital of Greece for 70 years he has accepted their laws. Further much disagrees with retaliation and rejects Critos suggestion to flee to Thessaly he will be welcomed there and free to speak. Socrates seems to have adhered to the belief that if he was born and raised in this state and had children here he moldiness have agreed with the ways in which the state operates therefore, he cann... ...ur rural area to intervene and help countries less able. South Vietnam needed the support of the U.S. in particular when the North Vietnamese forces threatened them. &9Thus, in result I believe that Socrates was correct to disregard the opinion of the majority. Socrates accepts his fate, for this reason wholly he is not a coward. Socrates disagrees with retaliation and has faith in the establishment of Athens. Although Socrates may not agree with the decision of the assembly to put him to his death, he reali zes that he was done wrongly by the assembly rather than the laws of Athens themselves. I believe Socrates feels this way because he has lived under the laws of Athens for 70 years and he has raised his children under the same principles. Socrates accepts the fact that being a member of society demands a certain respect and obedience. Without the rules and punishment system Athens would not be able to function properly. As Socrates decided to become a citizen of the state of Athens he too takes along with him the responsibility of being a citizen of that state. In following the more reasonable people I believe Socrates is merely following the path in which the Gods intended.